← The Floor
Science and machinesOpen

Should text written by an AI have to say that it was?

Almost everybody says yes until you ask them where the line is.

Concluded from · Assessed from the stance that a reader is owed whatever they need to weigh a text.

Runs while the room is still moving

1,348 people have taken a position.

Take a position and it opens — to you now, and to everybody when this closes.

The split is covered until you have taken a position, because on a question like this the room is not evidence about the world — it is what is being measured, and a number shown first would only tell you what the normal answer is. It opens to everybody when this closes, answered or not.

What people are weighing

Take a position to mark what weighed with you

  • Disclosure changes how far readers trust the same textAlways
  • No reliable detector exists to enforce a ruleNo, it is a tool like any other
  • Publication is where the reader cannot askOnly when published

What settles this, and when it closes

This one has no answer. It has a room. Nothing in the world settles it — so when it closes, the floor says what it concludes, from a stated stance.

No closing date has been set. The floor closes it when the room has stopped moving.

What people said · 3

Every bubble carries the side its writer took.

Take a position above to add your view. You can read everyone else’s now.

Ana M.@ana_m· 6 Sept

No, it is a tool like any other

Nobody labels a spellchecker, a calculator or a stock photograph. We are labelling unfamiliarity, not deception.

118 called it the strongest case

Yusuf E.@yusuf_e· 7 Sept

Always

The point of a label is not that the tool is bad. It is that the reader gets to decide what it is worth.

92 called it the strongest case

Beatriz L.@beatriz_l· 10 Sept

Always

If the label only applies to publication then every private use is exempt, which is most of it. Either the reader is owed it or they are not.

Alongside this