Is it wrong to use an AI to write a message to a friend?
You will not be told what most people said until you say what you think.
Concluded from · Assessed from the stance that a message is worth the attention behind it.
Runs while the room is still moving
1,331 people have taken a position.
Take a position and it opens — to you now, and to everybody when this closes.
The split is covered until you have taken a position, because on a question like this the room is not evidence about the world — it is what is being measured, and a number shown first would only tell you what the normal answer is. It opens to everybody when this closes, answered or not.
What people are weighing
Take a position to mark what weighed with you
- The friend cannot tell, which is the point or the problem
- Condolences and birthdays are not the same messageDepends what the message is
- Nobody objects to a phone suggesting the next wordNot wrong at all
What settles this, and when it closes
This one has no answer. It has a room. Nothing in the world settles it — so when it closes, the floor says what it concludes, from a stated stance.
No closing date has been set. The floor closes it when the room has stopped moving.
What people said · 3
Every bubble carries the side its writer took.
Take a position above to add your view. You can read everyone else’s now.
Lucia R.@lucia_r· 7 Sept
The message is not the point. The minutes you spent on it were the point, and those are what you removed.
Tom H.@tom_h· 8 Sept
Half the sympathy cards ever sent were written by a stranger and signed by a friend. Nobody minded.
Elias R.@elias_r· 10 Sept
The message is not the words. It is the four minutes you spent on it. Outsourcing that and sending it anyway is the part that is wrong.




